>Rules for group games were there upon sign ups, and they are same as the last year,
>if someone doesn't read them it's his own fault.
I read rules and i have no complains about them.
My proposal is about 2014 edition.
Read carefully and pay attention please.
>And again you twist things
What did I twist? I criticized you for making incorrect statements. No twists.
>.. I never claimed the thing I told about football to be absolutely correct,
> and it doesn't need to be correct,
> and I don't need to waste my time on learning something ...
I totally disagree.
Of course you need to give yourself some time to do a research.
What kind of a mod are you if you yak about stuff you just don't know?
Get busy a bit. Mod work takes something you know.
>But of course as crazy about football as you are you would think that was the
>most important thing in the message.
Why you constantly bring up some irrelevant things and try to hide behind them?
I clearly don't think that football is most important thing in your message.
I just say that you use incorrect information to prove your point.
That is what mod shouldn't do.
>Now let me make one more assumption. If we were judging by football rules we would have
>3 people with 3 points and it would end up with me advancing due stats anyway.
Finally you started to read before writing.
So you basically propose to review a hypothetical situation where
Thouson plays 2-3 vs Fantomas and ends up with 4 points. Same as you and Jellenio.
And you get a 3-player tie.
CL system will use exactly same algorithm in this case.
But result will be different.
Why is this a problem?
According to CL system:
In the 2 player tie-breaker (you, Jellenio) you lose.
In the 3-player tie-breaker(you, Jellenio, Thouson) you win.
It is totally fair. Why do you think there is any contradiction?
Fact that you would advance in the 3 player tie-breaker don't change the fact that Jellenio should advance in 2 player tie-breaker vs you.
There also is no extra code work. Just changing one formula.
System will still be automatic just a bit more fair.
>And the fact it's the first issue about the system only confirms it,
>especially given the fact you wouldn't
>give a single damn about it if it was someone else advancing rather than me.
I have nothing against CWT 2013 system.
We had an opportunity to change it.
We didn't care.
So we can't complain.
Also i didn't question your place in PO.
You got it in a fair battle.
Jellenio knew what he needs to do and he failed the task.
I criticized you for your incorrect statements and made a proposal for 2014 edition point calculating system.
Pay attention please. Don't jump on me with false accusations without a second thought.
You are making too many bad moves to carry on.
>If you don't understand something it doesn't mean it's wrong.
I understand everything good.
You are the one who have problems with understanding facts and accepting the critics.
Just improve as a mod.
No need to start a hate race.
>You have an idea? Post it on forum, it will be discussed. Want some attention? Sorry it's not the place.
It is obvious i will post my idea on forums. And i don't need any advices from a forum-hater like you to do that.
Possible rules changing for a next season can't be decided in a game comments.
It was just a quick heads up.
>So what's your business here anyway?
I don't like your mod work and I criticize you for that.
In a calm manner. Using facts.
Mods have to be serious and responsible for their words.
Having indolent talker as a CWT mod is just bad.
Change your attitude towards critics. Stop reacting on on it by throwing insults back.
It looks bad.
> Quite funny to hear this arrogant stuff about deep breathing and thinking from the likes of you.
I wasn't arrogant.
Just wanted to calm you down.
on Nov 13, 2013 at 20:17